Other Hip Replacement Techniques

SuperPath® vs. Traditional Posterior and Anterior Approaches

Although the SuperPath® Hip technique and the anterior approach are both soft-tissue sparing techniques, a comparison of peer reviewed clinical data from the two approaches illuminates many key advantages of the SuperPath® technique:

 

NR: Not Reported; SNF: Skilled Nursing Facility; HHC: Home Health Care
Every patient is different, and individual results will vary. There are risks and recovery times associated with surgery.

REFERENCES:

  1. Chow et al., Modified superior approach for THA with percutaneous assistance: Technique and early results. Paper 353, AAOS Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 2011
  2. Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalHCAHPS.html. Reported mandatory HCAHPS scores for patient experience following Hips procedures. Scores reported by a single non-designing hip surgeon. Data on file at MicroPort.
  3. Chow et al., Modified micro-superior percutaneously-assisted total: Early experiences & case reports. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 4, p146-150, 2011
  4. Martin et al., A comparison of hospital length of stay and short-term morbidity between the anterior and the posterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 28, p849-54, 2013
  5. Alecci et al., Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a direct anterior approach versus the standard lateral approach: perioperative findings, J Orthopaed Traumatol, 12, p123-9, 2011
  6. Nakata et al., A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: Two consecutive series, J Arthroplasty, 24, p698-704, 2009
  7. Matta et al., Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table, CORR, 441, p115-124, 2005
  8. Jewett et al., High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table, CORR, 469, p503-507, 2011
  9. Seng et al., Anterior-supine minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: Defining the learning curve, Orthop Clin N Am, 40, p343-50, 2009
  10. Yi et al., Early complications of anterior supine intermuscular total hip arthroplasty, Orthopedics, 36, 2013
  11. Peters et al., Anterior supine intermuscular approach for total hip arthroplasty: A 90 degree turn-around, JBJS(Br), 91-B, 2009
  12. Rodriguez et al., Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach?, CORR, 472, p455-63, 2014
  13. Geest et al., Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: Complications and early outcome in a series of 300 cases, Acta Orthop Belg, 79, p166-173, 2013
  14. Barrett WP, Turner SE, and Leopold JP, Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28: 1634-8.
  15. Zawadsky MW, Paulus MC, Murray PJ, and Johansen MA, Early outcome comparison between the direct anterior approach and the mini-incision posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: 150 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29:
  16. Bergin PF, Doppelt JD, Kephart CJ, Benke MT, Graeter JH, Holmes AS, et al., Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 1392-8.
  17. Sugano N, Takao M, Sakai T, Nishii T, Miki H, and Nakamura N, Comparison of mini-incision total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach and a posterior approach using navigation. Orthop Clin North Am 2009; 40: 365-70.
  18. Taunton MJ, Bohannon Mason J, Odum SM, and Springer BD, Direct Anterior THA yields more rapid voluntary cessation of all walking aids: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2014
  19. Gofton W, Chow J, Olsen KD, Fitch DA Thirty-day readmission rate and discharge status following hip arthroplasty using the supercapsular persutaneously-assisted total hip surgical technique. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 2014.